The Downfall of MAGA

Is there hope after Trump?

In the lead up to the election of Donald J. Trump in 2016, having been exposed to new reactionary right wing ideas, was unsure if voting was just a futile endeavor. Although I wasn’t exactly the most enthusiastic supporter at the time, I was very much relieved when he defeated Hillary Clinton. I was positive that Hillary would have escalated U.S. involvement in Syria, potentially causing a clash with Russian forces in the region. As an Orthodox Christian, in the Antiochian Church at the time, I was also aware through various channels of the atrocities committed against Orthodox Christians in Syria by the “Rebel” groups supported by the U.S. State Department. So a victorious Donald Trump, with a promise to “drain the swamp” of the very freaks behind the persecution of my co-religionists brought me great relief and optimism. I also supported Trump for his stated immigration restrictions, in particular at the border wall, and significantly less legal immigration. Despite his lackluster first term, I still campaigned for his re-election, and protested Biden’s fraudulent election. If I was unsure of the viability of participating in the Democratic system back then, I’m more sure of my position now. There is no end in sight for mass legal immigration. A miniscule amount of deportations. And Trump has allowed Israel to drag us into a conflict with Iran, through his reckless decision to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities. At the time of this writing, it appears that the so-called “ceasefire” agreed upon between Iran and Israel, has already been violated by Israel. The stated objective of eliminating Iran’s nuclear capability has reportedly failed as well. But if the pattern of this conflict is anything like those in modern history in the region, Israel’s true goal of “regime change” has been set in motion. Donald Trump, although he may not have desired for the United States to be dragged into the conflict, potentially fell into a trap that will again require U.S. involvement in the next stage of the conflict. This failure of Donald Trump to remain true to America First principles, makes it clear for those with non-Kosher agendas that electoral victories are not a viable avenue for change in the United States.

You might recall that prior to the primaries, Donald Trump was facing several nefarious charges. It was an obvious political witch hunt, but given the corrosive nature of our system, they really could have made it stick. It seemed like it would. Who would have the power to make those legal woes disappear? Jewish influence certainly isn’t a monolith. I’ve written in the past about how the U.S. Political scene is basically a battle between the Jewish Left and the Jewish Right. That doesn’t mean there isn’t some coordination when necessary, because when it comes to the subject of Israel, all of them are Zionists. Trump’s legal woes disappear, and he suddenly is getting large campaign donations from Jewish donors such as Mariam Adelson. Now suddenly Israel is behaving as if it has a mandate to do whatever it wants in Gaza, and escalate the conflict with Iran. Just how often is blackmail used by Jewish forces to manipulate American Politicians? Certainly most Americans are aware of the Jeffrey Epstein blackmail operation. Who was Jeffrey Epstein blackmailing on behalf of? Even the official United States intelligence sources seem to suspect that it was for the Mossad. Are we to believe that these sort of operations stopped with the arrest and “suicide” of Jeffrey Epstein. Maybe after the targeted strikes of Iran’s nuclear facilities, and the ensuing “ceasefire” agreement, Trump would like to pivot away from the Middle East. But will they let him?

Perhaps less clandestine, but no less concerning is the visible foreign influence on American lawmakers by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. AIPAC lobbies on behalf of Israel, but is not required to register as a foreign agent. The last President that tried to require them to register as such, ended up dead. Recently in an interview with Tucker Carlson, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas claimed that AIPAC isn’t very effective. However, AIPAC themselves would beg to differ. They brag on their own website about how effective they were in the 2024 midterms. 96% of AIPAC endorsed candidates won their elections. Additionally they specifically targeted “anti-Israel” detractors, both Republican and Democrat. 11 out of 12 were defeated. The notable exception being Rep. Thomas Massie, who has pointed out that every Congressman is assigned a representative from AIPAC, who “advises” them on legislation. These foreign lobbyists have a direct line to the politician via their cell phones. Constituents from the lawmakers district are forced to be filtered through the staff. This very organization originated in the United States as the American Zionist Emergency Council, encouraging Jews to migrate to Palestine. After the creation of The State of Israel, it became the American Zionist Council to lobby for funding. But in 1954 it took on more of a Public Affairs role as the American Zionist Public Affairs Committee to help counter negative press for various Israeli massacres of Palestinians. Now AIPAC plays an expanded, and blended role on those objectives. They lobby for Israeli funding, anoint American politicians, do public affairs for Israel, and essentially make American laws. While the Zionist “right” has been doing these activities in the United States, US Jews have simultaneously been advocating for mass immigration to the United States, grossly manipulating the demographics. Since October 7th, 2023 American Jews have changed their tune on that, especially after massive backlash from Israel’s genocide in Gaza. It turns out some of the non-White immigrants to America didn’t arrive indoctrinated as dispensationalists with an undying support for “God’s Chosen people.” Is that why Trump was allowed to win again with the support of Jewish donors?

Perhaps he was allowed to win again, and remain out of prison, because rather than “draining the swamp,” he would put a Peter Tiel funded acolyte in office as his Vice President. This is the Peter Tiel who partnered with the Jewish, Alex Carp to create the CIA-funded Palantir. Palantir is essentially spyware, developed to make it easier to spy on and create profiles in databases on Palestinian Americans. The question though is really, is it a CIA asset or is it a Mossad asset? Who is controlling who? Thiel was also an investor in Carbyne, which was co-owned by Jeffrey Epstein, and other Israeli intelligence assets. Carbyne’s technology was nearly identical to Palantirs, and had direct connections to Israel’s intelligence division known as Division 8200. Is putting a Mossad/CIA asset in the White House, “draining the swamp?” Maybe the old guard was drained, and replaced with people a little more friendly to Israel.

The Republican Party, as promising as it seemed under Trump’s “America First” movement, has proven to be an abject failure at best and most likely an elaborate deception. Dear reader, ask yourself these questions. In a system founded up Democratic norms and principles, is it possible within such a framework to eliminate blackmail, and thus avoid having compromised authority figures? Is it possible under our current system to have politicians that aren’t controlled by foreign interests embedded in our system? Is it possible to totally eliminate something like AIPAC from having complete control over our lawmaking process? When foreign assets, even foreign intelligence operations, are embedded within our own intelligence operations, even directing them, is such a system salvageable? Is such a system which can just place its own officials in the White House alongside its already compromised President worth saving? The Reactionary Right may need to develop another strategy altogether, outside the scope of electoral politics. Maybe I have a plan, or maybe